They aren't calling it that, of course, but the premise is roughly the same. IBM's vice president of standards and open source Bob Sutor has mentioned that the company is considering ways in which avatars might travel between virtual worlds while keeping their essential appearance and possessions intact. This topic is on the agenda for discussion at the virtual worlds debate Friday at MIT.This is a forward-looking concept for IBM to consider, and the implications of it are exciting. It is intriguing as well, considering that IBM would seem to be doing this out of an altruistic sense -- they currently have no plans to develop an MMO themselves, as far as I'm aware. Which other worlds would SL residents travel to? Would the developers of other MMOs deny access to avatars from places they have no stake in? Imagine being able to travel from SL to There.com; what would be lost or gained in translation? Could this be seen as a benefit to other developers, simply to provide a destination and not have to worry about avatar creation? Chime in with your thoughts, readers!
(Via canada.com)












1. not so new. 'Microsoft Passport' had/has (is it still around) the same premise. Frankly, a virtual world passport would have to have similar information, which opens credit card information and other things to exposure - much like MS Passport did when it first came out.
I'm not saying it shouldn't happen. What I am saying is that maybe IBM will learn from that mistake... and maybe we'll stop repainting the cat and saying we got a new cat. :-)
Posted at 5:05AM on Jun 15th 2007 by Nobody Fugazi