I'm hard of hearing, as I've said before. Whilst I can hear, at least a bit, if I concentrate on voice without lipreading I can manage about 5 minutes before I get a headache. Given I'm prone to migraines as well, I'm not so keen on this. Over the last week I've been on the periphery of two voice only events - I use the term advisedly.
The first was after a class where a group of people gathered and chatted in voice. Until one of them IMed me to tell me that was what was happening I really didn't have a clue. Since I can't hear what they're saying, I was instantly, albeit briefly, totally excluded. The second was a presentation at NMC. In all fairness to the NMC people they found me a transcriber with almost no notice and I managed to follow what was going on pretty well. Kudos, and many thanks, for both looking and stepping up to do the job at no notice to all those involved.
Perhaps I'm living in a nicely isolated cocoon, and those around me all prefer text chat, or use it for my sake, but the fact that we're now, what 10 days into voice as the main client and I'm seeing the exclusion for the first time makes me wonder just what the uptake of this "customer demanded feature" is. New World Notes has a survey about this... No (I don't use voice) votes outnumber Yes votes about 2:1. No or mostly No polls 68.5% to Yes or mostly Yes polling 25.8%. Hardly massive demand (I'm a No vote of course).
I was going to comment that we seem to be voice luddites, but maybe we're just representative of the majority of SL residents...














1. Well, this customer demanded it, and is glad its finally arrived.
As for Hamlet's "survey" it indicates very little given how much it relies on motivated response. The anti-voice cadre is much more against voice than those who are pro-voice are for it (as an example, I saw Hamlet's survey and didn't care to answer it. But I'm willing to wager that someone who is strongly against voice was much more likely to answer the survey than I was).
In any event, the customers "demanding" this feature of LL were customers they didn't have yet. Lack of voice chat was a criticism of the platform made by many who had tried and rejected SL. Now, at least, one impediment to adoption has been removed. And given that there are likely many more potential customers-to-be who are happy to use voice than those who are nonplussed by it, voice was always going to happen.
Posted at 5:19PM on Aug 18th 2007 by Luciftias Neurocam