Continuing our ongoing coverage of the Bragg vs Linden Lab filings, we move on to Robreno's 30 May orders, denying Rosedale's Motion to Dismiss, and Linden Lab's Motion to Compel Arbitration. Judge Eduardo Robreno, you may recall, is the federal court judge who has been assigned to this case.
Along the way Robreno declares the Second Life Terms of Service invalid, and indirectly, it would appear, the Terms of Service of most or all other Virtual Worlds and MMO's by precedent.
Continue reading Bragg vs Linden Lab - Robreno says no - twice
Continuing our walkthrough of the Bragg vs Linden Lab filings, we move on to Bragg's second 16 January, 2007 filing. Bragg's Opposition to Rosedale's Motion to Dismiss.Continuing our walkthrough of the Bragg vs Linden Lab filings, we continue with Bragg's 16 January, 2007 Opposition to Linden Lab's Motion to Compel Arbitration.Continue reading Bragg vs Linden Lab - No arbitration, no terms of service (Part 2)
Continuing our walkthrough of the Bragg vs Linden Lab filings, we arrive at the 16th of January, 2007. Bragg made two filings on this day, backed up with assorted exhibits.Continue reading Bragg vs Linden Lab - No arbitration, no terms of service
Continuing our walkthrough of the Bragg vs Linden Lab filings, we have three new filings to play with. The first is dated 9 January 2007, and is Linden Lab's motion to admit Scott Baker, Esquire pro hac vice.Continuing our walkthrough of the Bragg vs Linden Lab filings, we get to 7 December 2006 and Linden Lab's filing in opposition to Bragg's motion to remand back to the state court.Continue reading Bragg vs Linden Lab - fifth filing - opposition squared
Continuing our walkthrough of the Bragg vs Linden Lab filings, we get to the 11 November filings in support of Bragg's motion to remand back to the state court.Continue reading Bragg vs Linden Lab - fourth filing, part 2
Continuing our walkthrough of the Bragg vs Linden Lab filings, we get to the last of the 7 November filings, now in the Federal Court (the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania).Continue reading Bragg vs Linden Lab - Fourth filing - We prefer the state court
Continuing our walkthrough of the Bragg vs Linden Lab filings, we get to a companion filing to Rosedale's motion to have himself dismissed from the case (also 7 November 2006). This one starts sinking the boot in. It's also our first look at the Terms of Service in full-on legal-document action.Continue reading Bragg vs Linden Lab - Third filing, part two - terms of service, on parade
Continuing our walkthrough of the Bragg vs Linden Lab filings, we get to some more 7 November filings, now in the Federal Court (the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania).Continue reading Bragg vs Linden Lab - Third filing - You can't have Philip!
Continuing our walkthrough of the Bragg vs Linden Lab filings, Linden Lab acknowledges the receipt of the original filing "on or about" 10 October, and have apparently retained Reed Smith LLP to act for them. On November 7 they made a 'timely' notice of their own (within 30 days of receipt in this case).Continue reading Bragg vs Linden Lab - second filing - Not here
About a month ago, I talked about the Bragg vs Linden Lab case, basically dissecting an interview with the legal counsel, Jason Archinaco. At the time, I promised to revisit this, and follow the case a little more closely.Well, there's been a lot of talk about Marc Bragg and his lawsuit against Linden Lab. Urizenus Sklar, editor emeritus of the Second Life Herald had an excellent interview with Jason Archinaco, Bragg's attorney in this matter. I'll be referring to that, but really, if you're interested in this topic, you should go read it.
Advertisement
Advertise with Second Life Insider
Other Weblogs Inc. Network blogs you might be interested in:
